Open banking data and payments API shown as one integration versus two vendors today

Which UK Open Banking providers offer both data and payments in one API?

Some UK providers deliver AIS and PIS through a single integration; others require separate products or contracts for each. An open banking data and payments API from one provider reduces engineering effort, but the difference matters less for cost than for the time your team spends building and maintaining two separate integrations.

Do any UK providers offer data and payments in one API?

Yes. A number of UK Open Banking providers offer both account information and payment initiation under one FCA-authorised integration. Others treat AIS and PIS as distinct products, sometimes with separate onboarding, separate documentation, and separate support teams, even when both sit under the same regulatory umbrella.

Single-API stack versus a split stack

Point of DistinctionSingle-API StackSplit Stack
Integration effortOne SDK, one set of documentationTwo integrations to build and maintain
Consent handlingOne consent flow for the customerSeparate consent flows for data and payments
Support relationshipsOne support queue, one point of escalationTwo vendors, two escalation paths
Contract countOne commercial agreementTwo commercial agreements to negotiate and renew

What actually doubles when AIS and PIS sit with different vendors?

Open banking data and payments API shown with three things a split stack always doubles

Splitting AIS and PIS across two vendors doesn’t just double the number of API calls your team writes. It typically doubles:

  • Consent flows. Your customer authorises data access with one provider and payment initiation with another, which usually means two separate bank redirect journeys instead of one.
  • Credential sets. Two sets of API keys, two sandbox environments, and two production environments to secure and monitor.
  • Support queues. When something breaks, you first have to work out which vendor is responsible before you can even raise a ticket.

For a small engineering team, this overhead is often more costly than any difference in unit pricing between providers.

When a split stack is genuinely fine

Open banking data and payments API shown with when a split stack genuinely works fine

A split stack isn’t automatically the wrong choice. It makes sense when you only need one capability today, with no clear roadmap for the other. A platform that only needs account verification data, for example, gains little from paying for payment initiation it won’t use for the foreseeable future. The problem arises when a business adds the second capability later and discovers it means onboarding an entirely new vendor rather than switching on an existing one.

How Finexer brings data, payments and verification together?

Finexer provides AIS, PIS and identity verification behind one FCA-authorised integration, rather than as separate products requiring separate contracts. For a platform building both a data-driven onboarding flow and a payment journey, this removes the need to manage two vendor relationships for one connected workflow.

In practical terms, this means:

  • One integration covering account data, payment initiation and verification
  • One consent and credential setup instead of two
  • One support relationship if something needs resolving
  • Coverage across most of the UK banks, including business accounts and challenger banks
  • Transparent pricing with no hidden charges

Bottom line

Buying data and payments from separate vendors is sometimes the right call, but it comes with real engineering overhead: two consent flows, two credential sets, and two support queues. An open banking data and payments API from a single provider removes that overhead when you know you’ll need both capabilities.

See how Finexer Connect brings data, payments and verification together in one integration.

About the Author

Ravi Ranjan
Ravi Ranjan

Ravi Ranjan is Co founder & CEO of Finexer


Posted

in

,

by